Robert De Niro seemed to embody the strong man, positively-charged, in the style of Martin Scorsese, Taxi Driver versions and Raging Bull. And the more time passes, this image is false. The carcass is empty, sad man, endowed with an energy that does not change anything. It evaporates. Robert De Niro is passive. It does nothing to improve the lot of a movie, nothing to advance a story. It stagnates. It's his game, his beauty, his time. Almost as if Beckett had given courses Actors Studio.
His two finest roles are probably those of Heat (Michael Mann) and What Just Happened? (Barry Levinson). Or how it becomes clear that Robert De Niro has never had the energy to cope. Either he dies or he depressed a little at the end. He embodies a character Deleuzian exhaustion. That it is a generation exhausted. Here is a brief portrait of the artist to celebrate. And finally out of his dynamic image given by Taxi Driver. Its excess language, dynamism are suspects and reveal the inertia of the actor, his listless form, his indifference to the world. Scorsese is also a filmmaker, not depressed but totally depressed, he turns in circles and get nowhere, he gets angry in disjointed fragments. He does not know it is sad. Hence the choice of Robert De Niro, actor performative zero energy, the ability of change the world around non-existent or negative.
The beautiful nature of the actor is not she slow down a movie, to slow the course of the images. engage in the process of inertia and contemplation? Robert De Niro apostle of ataraxia?
Rémy Russotto
Hiç yorum yok:
Yorum Gönder